Humorous Wedding Speech by the Best Man -- Wedding Toasts Roasts Speec

Humorous Wedding Speech by the Best Man When Daniel came to me and asked me to be his best man, it was a great honour but, when I looked at all the duties required of me, I felt he’d be better off choosing someone else. Then he offered me a fifty, but I told him that it wasn’t a decision that money could change. So then he offered me a hundred. Anyway, good evening Ladies and Gentlemen - My name is Rob and it’s my pleasure to be Daniel's best man today. So let me tell you about all those best man duties that originally concerned me, because I was immediately stumped by the first one: ‘ensure that the groom’s face and hair are in order.’ Well Daniel, I have to say that if nature didn't get them in order the first time around, what chance did I have? It was also my responsibility to ensure the groom choose his clothes wisely. Well, there wasn't a suit in the shop that he didn't try on. As many of you know, Daniel's job as a Policeman requires him to keep calm in stressful situations, so it was a bit of a surprise when he asked the shop owner if he could throw in a spare pair of underpants too. My second duty was to get Daniel to the church on time. Not an easy task, particularly since Kim's nickname for Daniel is 'Everlast' - not for his bedroom skills, but for his time keeping. We have GMT, we have BST, but is anyone here familiar with PWT? Well, Daniel Wilson Time runs about 40 minutes behind either ... ...2 of us on the trip and it’s only fair that the culprit for this unfortunate accident remains anonymous, because it could ruin his wedding day if anyone else found out. Thinking that was pretty much it, Kim reminded me of a duty that wasn’t on my list. As best man, it is my job to keep all Daniel’s past female acquaintances at bay. I told her not to worry as the wedding is on a Friday, and I doubt they'd be allowed the day off school. So now I come to my final wedding day duty which isn’t a duty really – it’s a real pleasure: on behalf of the bridesmaids and myself I sincerely wish you, Daniel, and your lovely wife, Kim, everlasting love and happiness! Ladies and gentlemen, to the bride and groom!

Differences between indentured servants and slaves Essay

During the early years of the 1600’s many Europeans and Africans moved over from England and became indentured servants. Indentured servants were employed by wealthy people and were used mainly for cheap labor. Some types of labor consisted of working in the fields and helping farmers. Around the 1680’s is when the employment of indentured servants slowly dropped. The reason for the drop was due to the rise of slavery. This was masterminded by European and euro-American colonist who created a slave based community. There were even laws that made slavery race dependent. There were some differences between indentured servants and slaves. Indentured servants were used for cheap labor. They communicated easily with their masters due to having the same religious views and cultures. Indentured servants were under a contract that banded them to their master for 7 years. Once the contract expired after 7 years they were freed. They were then allowed to acquire their own land. Slaves were also used for labor but there were laws that were put in place that treated them differently. One law they had was the â€Å"Anti-amalgamation law, which outlawed interracial sex and marriage, rendering any relationship between a male colonist and a female slave illegal, and any relationship between an African American male slave and a female colonist intolerable†. (Schultz, 2014). If an African American mother was to have a child, that child was born into slavery and thus made the child a slave as well, once he or she was old enough. The slaves did not have a contract that expired after 7 years. Slaves were permanently owned by their masters. This meant that their masters could punish them any way he saw fit for anything they did wrong. There were also no laws that oversaw the killings of someone’s own slave. The reason I chose this topic for my journal entry is because I did not know anything about indentur ed servants. I did not know such practice existed. I knew about slavery but did not have much knowledge about the subject until I read Chapter 3. References Schultz, K.M. (2014). U.S. History through 1877 (3rd ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection database.

Lizardo vs Denny Inc. NDI Free Essay Example, 750 words

LIZARDO VERSUS DENNY INC. NDI of Affiliation LIZARDO VERSUS DENNY INC. NDI In handling the situation, the security guards and the Denny’s management should have calmly sorted out the issue, therefore avoiding the extremism they found themselves in. In a country having high racism records, the affected races were bound to be paranoid and treatments from the major races that seemed unfavorable were construed to be discrimination. Having this at the back of their minds, it would have been therefore proper that the when Chiu complained of the long wait and introducing the element of discrimination, to be explained to that there were others on the waiting list long before them. A customer’s complaint should have been addressed soberly and not with annoyance of Ms. Kirts and the subsequent ejection of Lizardo, the second complainant to their services. The security guards reaction and the shoving of the two plaintiffs’ was a clear indication that Mr. Adam had personalized the whole issue which should not have been the case. The security guard should not even have involved himself in the word exchange as this aggravated the tension and led to the physical fights. We will write a custom essay sample on Lizardo vs Denny Inc. NDI or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now He should have however restrained himself from anything that would suggest to the paranoid plaintiffs that they were being discriminated against. The manager on the other hand also seemed to have personalized the issue and the African American complaint of the security guard is taken as an offence leading to the profane respond that made them be ejected too out of the restaurant. She however would have ignored their talk or rather promise to deal with it instead of complicating the matter further. 2 The security guards’ daytime occupation influenced the decision of the case on account that the guards were sober at the time of the incident and hence not intoxicated. It therefore follows that the steps they took at the parking lot were within their scope of profession and in line with their duty to avoid disruption of public peace in this case, by the plaintiff’s who from the facts had patronized one of the bars before coming to the restaurant. It is worth noting that as the guards of the restaurant, they were therefore expected to perform their duties accordingly and get assistance where required. 3 A claim of discrimination requires the party claiming discrimination to show that the major group had received a preferential treatment or the minority group had been victims of an outright hostility in comparison to the treatment given to the major group (Schiek & Bell, 2007). At all material times the two groups should have been similar in significant respects but the major group should have been treated with preference to the minor group or should have receive hostility which the major group was treated in a better respect. There is also need to establish that the group being discriminated upon was engaged in an activity protected under the anti-discrimination statutes in this case, the U. S Code of 1981 against discrimination. The discriminating party should be aware of the minority party’s participation in the protected activity and as such still took an adverse action against the minority. There should also be a nexus between the protected activity and the adverse action taken by the discriminating party (Fredman, 2011). The court ‘s decision is justified on the ground that the plaintiffs in this case could not sufficiently prove the above so as to convince the court that the action of the Denny Inc. amounted to a discrimination based on their racial affiliation. In the restaurant there were other minorities who were served and were seated. It is also worth noting that there were other people in the in the list who were waiting to seat and besides that there was an action being done to see them get a place for the six of them. A comparison to the few patrons who had been seated before them was not sufficient to warrant a claim of discrimination their part. This is because these patrons were there before them. Considering that the plaintiffs could not give evidence of any patron who was given preferential treatment, there claim could therefore not stand. The ejection of the plaintiff was not sufficient to warrant discrimination but was a mere lack of manners on the part of the defendants. 4 The court of appeal decision is based on a review of the district court. The decision is reached after examining the entire record and determining whether there was proof an intentional discrimination by the defendant to the plaintiff based on the facts given. The court of appeal therefore examined all the relevant facts of the plaintiff and the defendant’s case before reaching their decision. This will therefore form a good precedent as the court was detailed in explaining what amounted to or did not amount to discrimination and on what circumstances would a situation be described as discriminatory. In subsequent cases of similar issues the courts will hence have a lesser task in determining discrimination of lack of it. It therefore follows that discrimination would be established where the group claiming discrimination proves that the other party was given preferential treatment in an event that both of them were at similar in significant respects. It is also important to show that the discriminating party intentionally engaged in an activity that was adverse to the plaintiff’s protected right to non-discrimination. Any action besides this will not amount to discrimination but a mere lack of civility. References Fredman, S. (2011). Discrimination law. Oxford [etc. : Oxford University Press. Schiek, D., & Bell, M. (2007). Cases, materials and text on national, supranational and international non-discrimination law. Oxford [u. a.: Hart.